Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Euro Surveill ; 26(3)2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1041841

ABSTRACT

When facing an emerging virus outbreak such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a quick reaction time is key to control the spread. It takes time to develop antivirals and vaccines, and implement vaccination campaigns. Therefore, preventive measures such as rapid isolation of cases and identification and early quarantine of cases' close contacts-as well as masks, physical distancing, hand hygiene, surface disinfection and air control-are crucial to reduce the risk of transmission. In this context, disinfectants and antiseptics with proven efficacy against the outbreak virus should be used. However, biocidal formulations are quite complex and may include auxiliary substances such as surfactants or emollients in addition to active substances. In order to evaluate disinfectants' efficacy objectively, meaningful efficacy data are needed. Therefore, the European Committee for Standardisation technical committee 216 'Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics' Working Group 1 (medical area) has developed standards for efficacy testing. The European tiered approach grades the virucidal efficacy in three levels, with corresponding marker test viruses. In the case of SARS-CoV-2, disinfectants with proven activity against vaccinia virus, the marker virus for the European claim 'active against enveloped viruses', should be used to ensure effective hygiene procedures to control the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/standards , COVID-19/prevention & control , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Disinfectants/standards , Preventive Medicine/standards , Virus Diseases/prevention & control , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 106(2): 264-270, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-765088

ABSTRACT

The World Health Organization (WHO) hand-rub formulations have been in use around the world for at least the past 10 years. The advent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has further enhanced their use. We reviewed published efficacy data for the original and modified formulations. Only efficacy data according to the European Norms (EN) were found. The bactericidal efficacy of the original formulations was, under practical conditions, partly insufficient (EN 1500, only effective in 60 s; EN 12791, efficacy too low in 5 min). The first modification with higher alcohol concentrations improves their efficacy as hygienic hand rub (effective in 30 s). The second (0.725% glycerol) and third (0.5% glycerol) modification improves their efficacy for surgical hand preparation (effective in 5 and 3 min). The original and second modified formulations were tested and demonstrate activity against enveloped viruses including severe acute resiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 30 s. The ethanol-based formulation is also active against some non-enveloped test viruses in 60 s (suspension tests, EN 14476). In-vivo data on the formulations would provide a more reliable result on the virucidal efficacy on contaminated hands but are currently not available. Nevertheless, the most recent modifications should be adopted for use in healthcare.


Subject(s)
2-Propanol/standards , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/standards , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Disinfectants/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Hand Disinfection/standards , Infection Control/standards , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , World Health Organization
3.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 19(8): 1822-1825, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-618392

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19), which causes coronavirus disease 2019, is highly contagious and a particularly popular problem in all around the world and also in all departments of every hospital. AIMS: Protecting the well-being of the aesthetic dermatologists while providing a sufficient workforce is vital for pandemic planning. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In this article, we will discuss this problem from an aesthetic dermatology aspect and we will review whether these procedures are safe or not.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Cosmetic Techniques , Dermatology/organization & administration , Infection Control/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/standards , COVID-19 , Congresses as Topic/standards , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Dermatologists/organization & administration , Dermatologists/standards , Dermatology/education , Dermatology/standards , Education, Medical/organization & administration , Education, Medical/standards , Esthetics , Hand Hygiene/standards , Humans , Infection Control/instrumentation , Infection Control/standards , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Telemedicine/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL